Skip to main content

EFF's international team advocates for privacy, free speech, and an open Internet in international venues and across the world. We expose mass and unwarranted surveillance, and educate unlawfully targeted users on how to protect themselves and their colleagues. We use individual cases globally to highlight the effect of technology on human rights, and defend technologists from persecution and detention wherever they live.

Ensuring users' voices are heard in global policymaking

Internet users are impacted not only by rules and policies made in their own country, but those made around the world. EFF's international team fights to make sure that Internet users are heard in these processes. They include copyright treaties developed by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), trade agreements such as the now-defeated Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), domain name policies developed by ICANN, and increasingly, a shadowy web of cross-border industry agreements forged in corporate backrooms.

Where international bodies lack an adequate rights-based framework for their deliberations, EFF also works to fill the gap by developing global principles such as the Manila Principles for Intermediary Liability and the Necessary and Proportionate principles. We use these to promote users' rights on the global stage in bodies such as the United Nations General Assembly, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Internet Governance Forum (IGF).

Fighting unchecked surveillance laws and norms

We fight laws and treaties that seek to legitimize mass surveillance and weaken civil liberties and transparency. We work to spotlight privacy violations throughout the world and defend against influential governments seeking to increase law enforcement and intelligence agencies’ power. EFF fends off proposals for mandatory data retention, wiretapping-friendly legislation, national identity schemes, biometrics initiatives, and invasive location tracking. EFF works with digital rights organizations around the globe to fight for privacy, and  pressure telecommunications companies to protect the privacy of their customers.

Exposing Institutional Censorship

EFF recognizes that much of today’s free expression takes place on corporate platforms, which apply their own rules and are subject to the legal requirements of different jurisdictions. While in recent years most major companies have produced transparency reports that show content takedowns made at the behest of government actors, there is little to no transparency regarding takedowns made on the basis of terms of service. Furthermore, companies often prohibit certain legal content, such as nudity.

We encourage social media companies to operate with greater transparency and accountability. To that end, we partner with Visualizing Impact on Onlinecensorship.org, which collects reports from users in an effort to shine a light on content takedowns. We also regularly advocate for companies to make policy changes, particularly when their policies result in discriminatory practices.

Protecting vulnerable populations from digital attacks

EFF works to protect vulnerable populations from digital attacks. We seek to compensate for the asymmetry between powerful attackers and  targets who do not necessarily have a strong, technical understanding of digital security or a team of experts at their disposal. We research the threats that these populations face, such as state-sponsored malware.  We raise awareness of digital privacy and security issues through our Surveillance Self-Defense project and conduct security trainings based on these materials. We also defend the rights of security researchers through our work on export controls and EFF's Coders Rights Project. so that these researchers can continue to contribute to the safety and security of vulnerable populations.

Defending Technologists and Censored Voices Across The World

Throughout its history, EFF has defended those who have been unfairly targeted with prosecution and detention simply because they used technology to exercise their civil liberties. With our Offline project, EFF seeks to highlight the international cases of individuals who have used technology to speak out against abuse, or have built and shared technology that protects or extends human rights, and have been imprisoned as a result. We work with the communities that support these prisoners of conscience, draw attention to their predicament, and work for their release.

International Highlights

Shadow Regulation

Shadow Regulations are voluntary agreements between companies (sometimes described as codes, principles, standards, or guidelines) to regulate your use of the Internet, often without your knowledge.
Shadow Regulation has become increasingly popular after the monumental failure of restrictive Internet laws such as ACTA, SOPA and PIPA. This...

Banner Graphic: 

Digital Privacy at the U.S. Border: Protecting the Data On Your Devices and In the Cloud

Digital Privacy at the U.S. Border:Protecting the Data On Your Devices and In the Cloudby Sophia Cope, Amul Kalia, Seth Schoen, and Adam SchwartzDownload the report as a PDF.EXECUTIVE SUMMARYأفادت الحكومة الأمريكية أن عدد حالات تفحص المحتويات الالكترونية على الحدود قد إزداد بمقدار خمسة أضعاف خلال سنة واحدة فقط،...

International Updates

an eye covers a globe in multi-hued background

Calls Mount—from Principal UN Human Rights Official, Business, and Tech Groups—To Address Dangerous Flaws in Draft UN Surveillance Treaty

As UN delegates sat down in New York this week to restart negotiations, calls are mounting from all corners—from the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to Big Tech—to add critical human rights protections to, and fix other major flaws in, the proposed UN surveillance treaty, which as...

an eye covers a globe in multi-hued background

Weak Human Rights Protections: Why You Should Hate the Proposed UN Cybercrime Treaty

The proposed UN Cybercrime Convention dangerously undermines human rights, opening the door to unchecked cross-border surveillance and government overreach. Despite two and a half years of negotiations, the draft treaty authorizes extensive surveillance powers without robust safeguards, omitting essential data protection principles. This risks turning international efforts to fight cybercrime...

an eye covers a globe in multi-hued background

لماذا يجب أن تعادي مسودة اتفاقية الأمم المتحدة للجرائم الإلكترونية

إن الاتفاقيات الدولية التي تبرمها الأمم المتحدة لا تحظى عادة باهتمام المستخدمين/ات. فهي تخضع للمناقشة، في كثير من الأحيان على مدى سنوات عديدة، من قِبَل الدبلوماسيين/ات ومسؤولي/ات الحكومة في فيينا أو نيويورك، وكثيراً ما يتم تجاهل أهميتها أو فقدانها في خضم طوفان المعلومات والأخبار التي نعالجها كل يوم، حتى عندما تعمل على توسيع صلاحيات الشرطة وتهديد الحقوق الأساسية للناس في مختلف أنحاء العالم.وهذه هي الحال مع اتفاقية الأمم المتحدة المقترحة للجرائم الإلكترونية. لأكثر من عامين، كانت مؤسسة الجبهة الإلكترونية وشركاؤها/يكاتها في المجتمع المدني الدولي منخرطين/ات بعمق في نشر الوعي والنضال من أجل إصلاح العيوب الخطيرة في مسودة الاتفاقية. وفي الأيام المقبلة، سننشر سلسلة من المنشورات القصيرة التي تبحر بعمق في نص المسودة الكثيف والعالي التقنية، وتشرح التأثيرات الحقيقية للاتفاقية في العالم الحقيقي.إن الاتفاقية المقترحة، التي دفعت بها روسيا وبرعاية مكتب الأمم المتحدة المعني بالمخدرات والجريمة، هي اتفاقية مقترحة بين الدول تهدف على ما يبدو إلى تعزيز التحقيقات عبر الحدود وملاحقة مجرمي/ات الإنترنت الذين/ اللواتي ينشرون البرامج الضارة، ويسرقون البيانات مقابل فدية، ويتسببون في خروقات البيانات، من بين جرائم أخرى.المشكلة هي، كما هو مكتوب حاليًا، أن الاتفاقية تمنح الحكومات سلطات مراقبة وجمع بيانات هائلة لملاحقة ليس فقط الجرائم الإلكترونية، ولكن أي جريمة تحددها على أنها خطيرة تنطوي على استخدام جهاز كمبيوتر أو نظام اتصالات. في بعض البلدان، يشمل ذلك انتقاد الحكومة في منشور على وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي، أو التعبير عن الدعم عبر الإنترنت لحقوق مجتمع الميم – عين+، أو نشر أخبار عن الاحتجاجات أو المذابح.ستضطر شركات التكنولوجيا وموظفوها/اتها في الخارج، بموجب أحكام معينة من المعاهدة، إلى مساعدة الحكومات في سعيها للحصول على بيانات الأشخاص ومواقعهم/ن واتصالاتهم/ن، مع مراعاة الاختصاصات القضائية المحلية، والتي يفرض العديد منها غرامات قاسية.لقد أطلقنا على مسودة الاتفاقية بأنها شيكًا مفتوحًا لإساءة استخدام المراقبة التي يمكن استخدامها كأداة لانتهاكات حقوق الإنسان والقمع عبر الوطني. إنها معاهدة دولية يجب على الجميع معرفتها والاهتمام بها لأنها تهدد حقوق وحريات الناس في جميع أنحاء العالم. ترقب/ي منشوراتنا التي تشرح كيف.

Pages

Back to top

JavaScript license information